28 October 2011
First, like telegrams, these
messages arrive with an immediacy that seems to demand my instant attention. Rarely
do the messages possess the urgency they proclaim, but I ignore them at my
peril. The message assumes importance from the medium by which they arrive, but
in fact in most cases they are simply a call for immediate mundane response. What
time is dinner? What does diurnal mean? Can I have a sleep over or go to Los
Angeles for Winter Break?
But instant attention is what these
messages demand. I think these missives (I almost wrote missiles!) reflect the
contemporary culture of the need for instant gratification. As soon as an issue
is raised a response must be sought and received. I recall once a lawyer friend
of mine bemoaning the introduction of fax machines to his office: now documents
could be instantly transmitted and he was obliged to stay in the office
awaiting arrival and making response. Before this new technology he could at
least hold off the onslaught until the morn. But these instant messages,
different than emails that for the most part have required that one at least be
seated at a desk in front of the computer in order to respond (though the
advent of smartphones means that our desks travel with us) make it all the more
impossible to escape a weighing sense of obligation. Texts go where no email
has gone before: in tunnels and up mountains, into places where wi-fi has not
been—and may never be—present. These instant messages
requiring instant response suggest that little time has been given for any thoughts
on the question posed nor has any personal effort been made to independently seek
answer. The need for immediate answer becomes a pressing demand. I want the
world and I want it now!
Finally (for now), these messages
assume a simplicity that reality just doesn’t offer. Questions and concerns are
posed in these telegrammatic communications that in conversation might demand
engagement in serious extended conversation, and would involve complex consideration
and response. However, the medium itself precludes such engagement. I am
condemned to click away with my thumbs or poke with my index finger while the
phone corrects my spelling with often appalling results.
1 Comments:
From The New York Times:
Apple’s iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad devices include an auto-correction feature for typing that can sometimes make less than desirable changes to your text. Fortunately, you can turn this feature off.
On the Mac, open the System Preferences box, either by clicking its icon in the Mac’s Dock or going to the Apple menu in the top left corner and selecting System Preferences. In the System Preferences box, click the Language & Text icon, then click on the Text tab. Remove the check from the box next to “Correct spelling automatically.”
For those who do not mind automatic correction but would prefer to use British spelling conventions instead of those used in American English, the Spelling drop-down menu in the same Text tab offers the choice of British English (as well as the Australian and Canadian variations).
Post a Comment
<< Home