11 December 2011
He asked how I could keep such knowledge from him. I
shrugged my shoulders and responded that I did not know. But, in fact, I think
I did know. I have actually considered just
that question for some time now because I have of late been loath to talk to anyone
about any matter concerning myself other than my thoughts on intellectual (the reading) and impersonal matters (the gossip and politics). I’ve been
thinking about what that reticence might mean
So much of conversation turns on
the subject of complaint. “How are you?” And to too large an extent, we are not
overly interested in listening to the reply. The question is a formality, as is
the lack of response. “I’m fine (or not). And you?” And I did not want to
complain. Complaining, like whining, is such passive activity: we speak our
state rather than change it. Neither did I see much purpose in leaking. For
years I have referred to a particular form of conversation as ‘leaking,’ the
propensity to reveal neurotic proclivities rather than devote the energies
required to keep them private. I think that there is a qualitative difference
between leaking and complaining. In the former I acknowledge my own weaknesses
and bring them out for analysis, but in the latter I accuse the world for my
state and remain innocent. From the former I think intimate conversations may
flourish, but in the latter they arrive lifeless. I mean, what can be said to
complaint except that the one who complains is either right or wrong? To the complaint
one either extends or withholds sympathy, but from leaking one explores the
sources of the leak and even attempts some exploratory work and repair. From
leaking conversation and dialogue ensues, but complaint condemns the
participant to monologue. My concerns were not of the neurotic variety and so
entailed no leaking. And I would not complain.
I did not want to demand sympathy
and I did not want to experience disregard. I meant to impose no burden on
another in my need to merely unburden myself; and besides, nothing in the
conversation could not have affected a healing I sought or provide the comfort
that the cure I desired would ultimately bring. What could anybody offer that
would make me calm, and nothing in the complaint would fix what was broken. My
conversation could make nothing happen and I did not want to confess. From such
confession there could be no absolution.
So I didn’t tell because . . . because
to tell, perversely, would have felt to me some betrayal of the relationship. I
know relationships need not be easeful, but this particular sharing seemed to
offer nothing upon which anything further might be built. It would have asked for something that in a
way could not be given.
But can honest relationships follow
from such concealment?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home